Category: Blog

Jharkhand is a young state with a young population. A significant portion of its citizens are below the age of 35, yet youth-focused policy outcomes remain inconsistent. Challenges such as unemployment, migration, skill mismatch, and limited youth participation in governance continue to affect the state’s development trajectory.

Across India, several states have experimented with structured youth policies, leadership programs, and employment-focused reforms. While no model is perfect, Jharkhand can draw valuable lessons from these experiences to strengthen its own youth policy framework.

Why Youth Policy Matters for Jharkhand
Youth policy is not limited to education or employment schemes. It includes:

• Participation of youth in policy-making
• Skill development linked to real jobs
• Leadership development and civic engagement
• Institutional platforms for youth consultation

Without a comprehensive approach, youth policies risk becoming fragmented and ineffective.

Lessons from Other States’ Youth Policies

1. Institutional Youth Commissions (Maharashtra, Rajasthan)
Some states have created Youth Commissions or Youth Boards to act as advisory bodies for the government. These institutions:

Represent youth interests formally

Provide policy feedback to departments

Act as a bridge between government and young citizens

What Jharkhand can learn:
Jharkhand can establish a statutory Youth Policy Advisory Council with representation from students, young professionals, entrepreneurs, and grassroots leaders.

2. Employment-Linked Skill Development (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka)
States like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have focused on industry-linked skill programs, ensuring training aligns with market demand.

What Jharkhand can learn:
Skill development programs must be mapped to local industries, mining alternatives, MSMEs, agriculture value chains, and emerging sectors, rather than generic certification courses.

3. Youth Participation in Governance (Kerala)
Kerala has encouraged youth involvement through:

Local governance participation

Student and youth forums

Civic engagement platforms

What Jharkhand can learn:
Youth participation should go beyond elections. Jharkhand can integrate youth representatives into district planning committees and policy consultations.

4. Start-up & Entrepreneurship Support (Gujarat, Telangana)
States with strong startup policies have created:

Seed funding mechanisms

Incubation centers

Youth-focused entrepreneurship programs

What Jharkhand can learn:
Jharkhand can design youth entrepreneurship policies focused on local resources, tribal enterprises, and sustainable livelihoods.

5. Transparent Policy Communication (Delhi)
Clear communication of policies, eligibility, and timelines has helped reduce confusion and misinformation.

What Jharkhand can learn:
Youth policies must be communicated in simple language, through digital platforms, campuses, and local outreach.

The Missing Link: Youth Consultation Before Policy Formation
One of the biggest gaps in Jharkhand is the absence of structured youth consultation before finalizing policies. Many states now recognize that policies succeed when beneficiaries are involved early.

Youth consultation can:

Improve policy relevance

Increase acceptance and participation

Reduce implementation gaps

Jharkhand needs mechanisms where youth are asked, heard, and included before decisions are finalized.

From Schemes to Systems: A Policy Shift Needed
Jharkhand’s youth policies often operate as standalone schemes. What is needed is a long-term youth development framework that integrates:

Education

Employment

Leadership

Civic participation

Learning from other states shows that policy continuity and institutional support matter more than short-term announcements.

Conclusion:-
Jharkhand does not need to copy other states—but it can adapt proven ideas to its own social, economic, and cultural context. The experiences of states that have invested in youth participation, employment-linked skills, and leadership development offer clear lessons.

For Jharkhand to truly harness its demographic advantage, youth must move from being policy recipients to policy partners. Learning from other states is the first step toward building a future-ready youth policy ecosystem.

Jharkhand is one of the youngest states in India in terms of population, yet youth voices remain largely absent from policy-making processes. While government policies directly affect education, employment, skill development, and social mobility, young people are often treated as beneficiaries rather than active stakeholders. This gap has resulted in policies that fail to address ground realities and the aspirations of Jharkhand’s youth.

For Jharkhand to achieve inclusive development, youth participation in policy making is no longer optional—it is essential.

Youth Demographics and the Jharkhand Reality
More than half of Jharkhand’s population is below the age of 35. This demographic reality means that policies related to employment, education, migration, entrepreneurship, and digital access directly impact young people. However, policy decisions are often made without structured consultation with youth, leading to mismatches between policy intent and actual outcomes.

High youth unemployment, increasing migration, and skill mismatches are not just economic issues—they are policy failures that stem from limited youth representation in decision-making spaces.

Why Youth Participation in Policy Making Matters

1. Youth Understand Ground Realities
Young people experience the education system, job market, and social challenges firsthand. Their participation ensures that policies are practical, relevant, and implementable.

2. Policies Become Future-Oriented
Youth involvement brings long-term thinking into governance. Young policymakers naturally focus on sustainability, innovation, and future readiness—areas critical for Jharkhand’s growth.

3. Democratic Participation Is Strengthened
Democracy is strongest when citizens participate beyond elections. Involving youth in policy discussions builds democratic ownership, accountability, and trust in institutions.

4. Reducing Policy Disconnect
Many schemes fail due to lack of awareness or acceptance among youth. When young people are part of policy formulation, implementation becomes smoother and more effective.

The Cost of Excluding Youth from Policy Making
When youth are excluded, policies often result in:

Low adoption and engagement

Increased frustration and political disengagement

Migration due to lack of local opportunities

Rise in informal employment and social instability

Jharkhand cannot afford these outcomes if it wants to harness its demographic advantage.

How Youth Can Be Included in Policy Making in Jharkhand

1. Youth Policy Consultation Forums
Institutional platforms at district and state levels where youth can provide structured input on policies.

2. Youth Representation in Advisory Committees
Including young professionals, students, and grassroots leaders in government advisory bodies.

3. Participatory Policy Drafting
Draft policies should be opened for public and youth feedback before final implementation.

4. Civic and Political Education
Encouraging political awareness and policy literacy among youth ensures meaningful participation, not symbolic inclusion.

Youth as Partners, Not Just Beneficiaries
For Jharkhand’s development to be inclusive and sustainable, youth must be treated as partners in governance, not just recipients of schemes. Their energy, ideas, and lived experiences are valuable resources that can improve policy outcomes across sectors.

Meaningful youth participation also prepares the next generation of leaders who understand governance from within, strengthening institutions over time.

Conclusion:-
Youth participation in policy making is not a demand—it is a democratic necessity. Jharkhand’s future depends on how effectively it integrates young voices into its governance framework. Policies shaped with youth input are more responsive, resilient, and impactful.

A Jharkhand that listens to its youth is a Jharkhand that invests in its future.

Jharkhand is one of India’s youngest states — yet its youth are among the most distressed.
Unemployment, underemployment, addiction, and migration have become everyday realities for thousands of young people.

Over the past few years, while working closely with students, job-seekers, and young professionals across Jharkhand, one truth has become painfully clear: policies are being made for youth, but rarely with youth.

Why Current Policies Are Failing Youth
Most employment and skill-development schemes fail because:

• Youth voices are not consulted
• Ground realities are ignored
• Education and employment planning are disconnected
• Mental health impact of unemployment is overlooked
• A policy without youth participation is incomplete.

What Youth in Jharkhand Are Actually Asking For
From villages to cities, youth consistently demand:

• Transparent recruitment processes
• District-level employment planning
• Skill programs linked to real jobs

A formal platform to speak directly to policymakers

This is why initiatives like “Yuva Ko Puchho” are not campaigns — they are necessities.

The Way Forward: Youth-Centric Policy Making
Jharkhand urgently needs:

• A Youth Employment Commission
• Annual Youth Policy Consultations
• District Youth Councils linked to governance
• Accountability mechanisms for employment schemes

If youth are partners in policy, not just beneficiaries, solutions will emerge.

Conclusion
Jharkhand’s future depends on its youth.
And youth empowerment begins with listening.

Employment is not charity — it is dignity.
And dignity begins with participation.

It’s amazing ! The politics of India leaves no chance to surprise you. In Bihar, the government was once again formed and Nitish Kumar took oath as CM for the eighth time, but this whole effort to change the government gave rise to many questions and it is obvious that if there are questions, then there will be discussion. Now the question is only one, whether this distance of Nitish from BJP will affect the Lok Sabha elections 2024? Or is the BJP’s dream of 2024 heading towards breaking?

Its analysis is many but we have brought for you – Super Analysis, that too in your language.

Let us think of India’s electoral map as 3 strips. The 1^st one is coastal belt- runs from West Bengal to Kerala plus Punjab and Kashmir. This region has 190 Lok Sabha seats, where last time BJP and its allies won only 42 seats but this time some gain expected in Bengal and Telangana due to strong revival of BJP in this region with three layer approach- Rashtrawad, Hindutva and Labharthi Yojana. Let us assume that the BJP could have sum up with around 50 seats in this space.

We all know that BJP’s seats come from the regions where it dominates- the north west, comprising the hindi heartland, this region has 203 Lok Sabha seats where last time BJP and its allies won 182 seats. The BJP was swept this region in both 2014 and 2019 with strong presence and to see this we can make a generous assumption here that  the BJP continues to dominate this region with some marginal losses due to anti-incumbency factor and could have ended up with around 160 seats in this region.

Now to win 2024 battle, it needs another 65 seats out of 150 in the middle belt- Karnataka, Maharashtra, Bihar and Jharkhand with hill states like Assam, Tripura, Meghalaya and Manipur where the BJP may face some obstacles to repeat history of 2019- That is 130 seats victory. Lets start with Karnataka, although the BJP is getting ready with a special strategy in Karnataka but a repeat of 25 seats out of 28 looks to be difficult task. At the same time in Maharashtra, a coalition division may create electoral challenges for the BJP but just wait! Here, it is interesting to see that what would be the next step of Uddhav Thackeray and BJP-Shinde duo.

Now time to explore our last one electoral equations of Bihar. If the Nitish-Tejashwi alliance holds till the 2024, the mahagathbandhan and BJP vote share ratio come up with at least 42:38. Because a dent on Nitish Kumar image, a landslide of “Backwards vote” is not possible in Nitish Kumar favor this time and the BJP knows very well that how to grab such opportunities to turn electoral arithmetic.

So, sum up with conclusion, if we assume that the BJP does nearly as well in Jharkhand, Assam and hill states as it did last time, we are still looking at least 90 seats for the BJP which is more than required 65 seats from middle belt. So the BJP is in “Don’t worry” situation to retain it majority unless the opposition makes any charisma.

The political incompetence of the so called youth community, which accounts for 70 percent of the total population, can probably be seen in India itself, which claims to become a world leader in the next decade. It is surprising that even in the 21^st century, we are talking about the participation of youth in politics, but it is even more surprising when we hear the political parties constantly saying the participation of youth in politics increasing. Now biggest question is, if it is increasing then why is it not visible ant if not visible how is it growing. Isn’t it a full of suspense, Let’s understand with an analysis.

The potential of youth is unexplored in the parliamentary undertakings of the country. While India gladly calls itself a youthful country, around 11 percent of the Indian populace comes in the age section of 25-30. In Lok Sabha 2019, barely 1.5 percent of MPs fall in this age bunch. The Census 2011 additionally lets us know that more than 25% of the Indian populace came in the age section of 25-40; this gathering represents just 12% in the seventeenth Lok Sabha. Despite the fact that the extent of youth in the parliament has expanded from the past 8% in 2014, but question is on board till now- why is under-representation of youth in the parliament. For what reason is there under-portrayal of youth in the mainstream politics, and for what reason are youth hesitant to take part in the political machinery of the country?

It is a far reaching pattern that a larger part of the young present in the ongoing political talk rises up out of political families, for example abide into dynastical governmental issues. Youngsters with practically no political foundation standing,  find it challenging to make it into the political machinery of the nation. So the young aspirants of India are needing stages which assist them with elevating themselves to the degree of political acknowledgment. They need mentorship and direction which assists them with extending their spirit of advancement and address the largest age bracket of the country. They need a medium which conquers the requirement for familial connections in the field of politics and assists them with utilizing their true capacity and energy.

It is confident that when the Indian youngsters take the issues in their grasp, the New India ideated will be more developing and charming, After this many changes will be seen, many innovative technologies will be used to design the solution of contemporary issues of India and most importantly, bureaucrats will not be able to dominate so much.  Its our responsibility to change the theme of political system, it means balance between experience and youth energy because it cannot be denied that Indian politics needs experience for better function but it is equally true that without youth energy, that New India cannot be imagined whose growth is in double digit.